| Home | Login | MatchMaker | Resources | Organizing | The Lab |
The Machinery of Democracy: Accessibility of Voting Systems
« Resources
Support CCP's Work »
Help us increase civic participation and strengthen our democratic institutions.
Using This Site »
Learn to use the tools and resources available to you.
The Machinery of Democracy: Accessibility of Voting Systems
Description
Traditionally, many voters with disabilities have been unable to cast their ballots without assistance from personal aides or poll workers. Those voters do not possess the range of visual, motor, and cognitive facilities typically required to operate common voting systems. For example, some are not be able to hold a pen or stylus to mark a ballot that they must see and read. Thus, the voting experience for citizens who cannot perform certain tasks - reading a ballot, holding a pointer or pencil - has not been equal to that of their peers without disabilities.
The Help America Vote Act of 2002 took a step forward in addressing this long- standing inequity. According to HAVA,new voting systems must allow voters with disabilities to complete and cast their ballots - in a manner that provides the same opportunity for access and participation (including privacy and independence) as for other voters." In other words, as jurisdictions purchase new technologies designed to facilitate voting in a range of areas, they must ensure that new systems provide people with disabilities with an experience that mirrors the experience of other voters.
This report is designed to help state and local jurisdictions improve the accessi- bility of their voting systems. We have not conducted any direct accessibility testing of existent technologies. Rather, we set forth a set of critical questions for election officials and voters to use when assessing available voting systems, indicate whether vendors have provided any standard or custom features designed to answer these accessibility concerns,and offer an evaluation of each architecture's limitations in providing an accessible voting experience to all voters.
The report thus provides a foundation of knowledge from which election officials can begin to assess a voting system's accessibility. The conclusions of this report are not presented as a substitute for the evaluation and testing of a specific manufacturer's voting system to determine how accessible a system is in conjunction with a particular jurisdiction's election procedures and system configuration. We urge election officials to include usability and accessibility testing in their product evaluation process.
Category: Civil Rights, Democracy Reform, Health and Disability
Attachment: Accessibility_10-10.pdf